Home
Obama May Be Deeper into Illinois Corruption Than We Thought Print E-mail
Thursday December 18, 2008 13:42

There are just two questions that Barack Obama won't answer in the scandal involving Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich's attempt to sell Obama's now-empty Senate seat to the highest "bidder".

  1. In light of the incredible corruption of Illinois politics, do you favor a special election to fill your Senate seat?  That way the people of Illinois can choose your successor and the winner will avoid the taint of scandal.
  2.  You said in a recent press conference that your office had minimal contact with the Governor, yet court papers show your Chief of Staff had 21 phone conversations with him.  How is it that 21 separate contacts constitutes "minimal" contacts in your opinion, Sir?  

On December 16th a reporter tried to ask Obama these questions and was immediately cut off by Obama as he followed the old-style political habit of squelching the airing of opposing views.  Obama would not even let him ask the question.  Obama's response, "John, John... let me, let me, let me just cut you off - because I don't want you to waste your question."  "The facts are going to be released next week, it would be inappropriate for me to comment."

He brilliantly cuts the reporter off just in time to keep him from actually re-stating the charges that would impugn the Obama team with possible corruption - while telling the reporter he's doing him a favor by not letting him "waste his question"!  Very much old-style politics there.  So much for "transparency" in government. 

The Disturbing Press Conference Audio

That is a stunning answer given Obama's campaign rhetoric about change.  This represents no change.  This is how scandals are typically handled by corrupt and guilty politicians. 

We have not written about this scandal here because until now we saw no evidence that Obama or his transition team had any involvement in it.  However, the special prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald has released information indicating that Obama's new Chief of Staff, Rahm Emmanuel has spoken to the corrupt Illinois governor 21 times since Obama's election (just a month and a half ago) about his eventual successor in the Senate.  This is a stunning revelation in light of Obama's statement last week that his office had had "minimal contact" with the Governor.  And it is the first evidence that has made us look up and take notice.

Let's look quickly at how Obama's response two days ago goes against what he promised in his campaign.  He promised first, "change".  He was clever enough never to specify exactly what kind of change he meant, but he purposely left everyone believing that he meant change for the better.  During the campaign he talked about how important it would be for the people's voices to be heard.  He emphasized how important "openness" and  "transparency" in government would be under his administration.  Yet his response two days ago goes against all that and reflects nothing more than politics as usual.  

Read more...
 
Obama - the Transformer Print E-mail
Saturday December 13, 2008 17:24

The Real Obama
A Centrist? No. A Transformer

By Charles Krauthammer
Washington Post
Friday, December 12, 2008; Page A27

As Obama revealingly said just last week, "This painful crisis also provides us with an opportunity to transform our economy to improve the lives of ordinary people." Transformation is his mission. Crisis provides the opportunity. The election provides him the power.

The job of Obama's economic and security appointees is to keep credit flowing and the world at bay so that Obama can address his real ambition: to effect a domestic transformation as grand and ambitious as Franklin Roosevelt's.

Barack Obama has garnered praise from center to right -- and has highly irritated the left -- with the centrism of his major appointments. Because Obama's own beliefs remain largely opaque, his appointments have led to the conclusion that he intends to govern from the center.

Obama the centrist? I'm not so sure. Take the foreign policy team: Hillary Clinton, James Jones and Bush holdover Robert Gates. As centrist as you can get. But the choice was far less ideological than practical. Obama has no intention of being a foreign policy president. Unlike, say, Nixon or Reagan, he does not have aspirations abroad. He simply wants quiet on his eastern and western fronts so that he can proceed with what he really cares about -- his domestic agenda.

Similarly his senior economic team, the brilliant trio of Tim Geithner, Larry Summers and Paul Volcker: centrist, experienced and mainstream. But their principal task is to stabilize the financial system, a highly pragmatic task in which Obama has no particular ideological stake.

A functioning financial system is a necessary condition for a successful Obama presidency. As in foreign policy, Obama wants experts and veterans to manage and pacify universes in which he has little experience and less personal commitment. Their job is to keep credit flowing and the world at bay so that Obama can address his real ambition: to effect a domestic transformation as grand and ambitious as Franklin Roosevelt's.

Read more...
 
The Election Was Stolen Print E-mail
Wednesday November 26, 2008 19:15

But Not in the Way You Think

Only 43% of Obama voters were able to correctly answer that Democrats controlled both Houses of Congress. In a year where the mood was for "throwing the bums out", it's significant that they didn't know from which party the bums came. 
Before you accuse us of being right-wing nut jobs for suggesting the 2008 Presidential Election was stolen, hear us out. It was stolen. But not in the usual way.
 
This year's election was stolen through media bias. I know it sounds like the typical partisan claim, but the difference is - this year even liberals are buying it. And could there be any doubt?
 
The man who won was a friend to a racist pastor and a domestic terrorist, he was a friend to the Jew-hating Louis Farrakhan. He chose for 20 years to sit in a church where the pastor preached "God damn America". An election victory would have been impossible if this candidate had been a Republican. The media would have drummed a Republican candidate out of the race based on any one of those things alone. But this year, those things hardly warranted a mention.
 
To politically-aware conservatives who are alarmed that the American people could have elected such a radical candidate, take heart... they didn't know what they were doing.  Most Americans pay attention to the news as if it were background noise. They pick up on the things they hear often repeated and don't pick up on anything that's not reported on TV night after night.
Read more...
 
The First Thanksgiving Print E-mail
Friday November 28, 2008 02:04

General Thanksgiving
Issued by the PRESIDENT of the United States Of America - George Washington
A PROCLAMATION

WHEREAS it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favour; and Whereas both Houses of Congress have, by their joint committee, requested me "to recommend to the people of the United States a DAY OF PUBLICK THANKSGIVING and PRAYER, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness:"

NOW THEREFORE, I do recommend and assign THURSDAY, the TWENTY-SIXTH DAY of NOVEMBER next, to be devoted by the people of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being who is the beneficent author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; that we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection of the people of this country previous to their becoming a nation; for the signal and manifold mercies and the favorable interpositions of His providence in the course and conclusion of the late war; for the great degree of tranquility, union, and plenty which we have since enjoyed;-- for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enable to establish Constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national one now lately instituted;-- for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge;-- and, in general, for all the great and various favours which He has been pleased to confer upon us.

Read more...
 
Obama's 40 Campaign Promises Print E-mail
Sunday November 30, 2008 00:24

Following is a list compiled by Investor's Business Daily of all the promises Obama made during his campaign.  Let's follow it and see how well he does.

Taxes

• Give a tax break to 95% of Americans.

• Restore Clinton-era tax rates on top income earners.

• "If you make under $250,000, you will not see your taxes increase by a single dime. Not your income taxes, not your payroll taxes, not your capital gains taxes. Nothing."

• Dramatically simplify tax filings so that millions of Americans will be able to do their taxes in less than five minutes.

• Give American businesses a $3,000 tax credit for every job they create in the U.S.

• Eliminate capital gains taxes for small business and startup companies.

Read more...
 
Democratic Policies Weaken America Print E-mail
Sunday September 21, 2008 19:57

On issue after issue after issue Democrats take up the side that weakens America while consistently opposing the side that strengthens America.

Democratic Crises

After examining issue after issue this year I was struck by one thought. Democrats seem to always support policies that weaken America while opposing policies that would strengthen her.

While spending considerable time trying to figure out why this would be, I think I’ve come upon a theory that explains everything.

The thing that made this such a mystery was my ability to accurately predict what stand the Democratic party would take on any given issue simply by asking which position would hurt America and which would help. Democrats consistently choose the policy that would most hurt America. Using this standard it is easy to predict which position Democrats will take on a wide variety of seemingly unrelated issues.

For instance, two unrelated issues: home mortgages and oil. On the surface these two issues have nothing in common, yet if you examine the results of policies Democrats favored and implemented, you will see that those policies have three things in common: they both failed, it was knowable in advance that they would fail and their failure was devastating to America.

 

 

 

Policies Democrats Oppose that would strengthen America:

  • Drilling for oil
  • Nuclear power
  • Lower Taxes
  • Making Life Difficult for terrorists
  • Anti-Missile Defense
  • Teacher-control of the classroom
  • School Choice
  • Photo ID when voting
  • Protect the borders
  • Environmental policies that put people first
  • Strong military
  • Strong CIA

 

In the 1990s Democrats supported policies that would strong arm banks into giving mortgages to less-than-creditworthy individuals so they could buy homes. These people had little ability to pay back the loans and traditionally would have been considered bad credit risks. But through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the Clinton administration assured the banks that was no problem.

When a bank makes a mortgage loan these quasi-governmental agencies purchase the loan, providing liquidity to the banking system by providing banks with a fresh infusion of capital that they then turn around and use to make more mortgage loans. As primary purchasers of mortgage loans Fannie and Freddie had the clout to set the credit standards banks would use in making loans.  If Fannie and Freddie demanded that banks lend only to customers with excellent credit, then that's what banks would do.  If they loosened their standards and agreed to purchase mortgages made to less creditworthy individuals, then the banks could loosen their standards and make even more loans.  Since the banks turn around and sell their mortgages to Fannie and Freddie, they have no real stake in whether the borrower actually pays the loan back.  So they base their credit requirements on whatever Fannie and Freddie will allow.  As far as the banks are concerned, if Fannie and Freddie will purchase mortgages made to less than creditworthy individuals - it's good for them because it allows them to make loans to more people, thus helping their bottom line. 

At the heart of this problem is the fact that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were directed by the Clinton administration to "liberalize" their credit standards so that people with credit scores less than what was traditionally acceptable could get mortgages. 

The stated intention was to make home ownership possible for more people. However, conservatives at the time often pointed out that this would eventually come back to haunt us as the less than credit-worthy borrowers defaulted and the taxpayer would have to bail everyone out.

 

 

 
Read more...
 
Dems' Hatred for Bush Print E-mail
Wednesday November 12, 2008 23:52

It will surely not be long before Liberals forget how hateful they were towards President Bush.  So we will put this article here to remind them.  This documents the vicious liberal hatred expressed towards George W. Bush for most of his presidency.  This article is typical of liberal sentiments expressed towards George W. Bush during most of his presidency. 


Goodbye and Good Riddance

Paul Waldman | November 11, 2008 |
The American Prospect
    
After eight years of President Bush, we almost don't know how to function without him -- almost. But before we move on, we should pause to remember just what we're leaving behind.
   
Just over two years into George W. Bush’s presidency, The American Prospect featured Bush on its cover under the headline, "The Most Dangerous President Ever." At the time, some probably thought it a bit over the top. But nearly six years later, it's worth taking a moment to reflect on the multifaceted burden that will soon be lifted from our collective shoulders.

Since last week, I have stopped short and shaken my head in amazement every time I have heard the words "President-elect Obama." But it is equally extraordinary to consider that in just a few weeks, George W. Bush will no longer be our president. Let me repeat that: In just a few weeks, George W. Bush will no longer be our president. So though our long national ordeal isn't quite over, it's never too early to say goodbye.

Read more...
 
Obama on "Change": NOT SO FAST! Print E-mail
Friday November 07, 2008 13:23

Obama Pick for Chief of Staff Criticized as Partisan Voice

Wall Street Journal
November 7, 2008

Rep. Rahm Emanuel's selection as chief of staff for Barack Obama drew criticism by Republicans and some Democrats.

President-elect Barack Obama's choice of Rep. Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff drew fire Thursday from Republicans, and a few Democrats, who noted that a candidate elected on a call for change had turned to a veteran partisan pugilist for his first appointment. Rep. Rahm Emanuel's selection as chief of staff for Barack Obama drew criticism by Republicans and some Democrats.

Mr. Emanuel, chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, accepted the crucial position after 24 hours of weighing family obligations and concerns that he would be turning away from an extended career on Capitol Hill. "I announce this appointment first because the chief of staff is central to the ability of a president and administration to accomplish an agenda," Mr. Obama said in a statement. "And no one I know is better at getting things done than Rahm Emanuel."  For the second day since his election triumph, Mr. Obama remained out of sight, as he huddled with aides and advisers in Chicago. He will break his silence with a news conference Friday, offering his first public statement since he claimed the presidency late on election night.

The Obama transition team also announced Thursday, in a joint statement with the White House, that Mr. Obama and his wife, Michelle, will meet President George W. Bush and first lady Laura Bush on Monday afternoon at the White House.

"No matter how we cast our ballots, this election gives us all reason to be proud of our democracy and our country," Mr. Bush said to White House employees.

Emanuel and ObamaMr. Obama also talked by phone with leaders of nine countries, including French President Nicolas Sarkozy, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.

But the first major task of the emerging administration was settling on a staff chief. Mr. Emanuel hinted at the difficult decision in his acceptance statement. In taking the job, the Illinois Democrat has left behind a career in Congress that began just six years ago but included engineering the Democratic takeover of the House in 2006 and rapidly ascending the ranks of leadership.

"I'm leaving a job I love to join your White House for one simple reason -- like the record amount of voters who cast their ballot over the last month, I want to do everything I can to help deliver the change America needs," he said. Mr. Emanuel, an Obama friend from Chicago's insular political world, brings to the post a hard-charging, sometimes profane voice that contrasts sharply with Mr. Obama's unflappable demeanor. He spent much of the Clinton administration inside the White House political office, shaping message and policy with a keen eye on its electoral impact. His legislative attention was focused on tax and health-care issues. But he angered some Latino organizations by steering the House away from a fight over an immigration-law overhaul.

Read more...
 
We Owe Obama Our Congratulations Print E-mail
Friday November 07, 2008 12:41
Our congratulations are in order to President-elect Obama for winning the 2008 presidential election.  As much as we have argued against his candidacy, he is now our president too.  For that we owe him our respect, and the promise to work with him when we agree and to oppose him when we disagree.  One thing you will not see from us though is the kind of mean-spirited, gratuitous and hateful personal attacks that mark much of the Left's response to President Bush.  We will argue with President-elect Obama on the issues - and nothing else.  He is our president and we wish him a very successful presidency because when he is successful, America is successful. 
 
The Devastation of "Community Organizing" Print E-mail
Saturday October 04, 2008 13:05

Chutzpah: ACORN's drive to lower mortgage standards paved the way for the meltdown - yet last week, it was holding protests like this one in Florida, trying to get a cut of the financial-market-rescue bill. Stanley Kurtz - Sept. 29, 2008

What exactly does a "community organizer" do? Barack Obama's rise has left many Americans asking themselves that question. Here's a big part of the answer: Community organizers intimidate banks into making high-risk loans to customers with poor credit.

In the name of fairness to minorities, community organizers occupy private offices, chant inside bank lobbies, and confront executives at their homes - and thereby force financial institutions to direct hundreds of millions of dollars in mortgages to low-credit customers.

In other words, community organizers help to undermine the US economy by pushing the banking system into a sinkhole of bad loans. And Obama has spent years training and funding the organizers who do it.

The seeds of today's financial meltdown lie in the Community Reinvestment Act - a law passed in 1977 and made riskier by unwise amendments and regulatory rulings in later decades.

CRA was meant to encourage banks to make loans to high-risk borrowers, often minorities living in unstable neighborhoods. That has provided an opening to radical groups like ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) to abuse the law by forcing banks to make hundreds of millions of dollars in "subprime" loans to often uncreditworthy poor and minority customers.

Any bank that wants to expand or merge with another has to show it has complied with CRA - and approval can be held up by complaints filed by groups like ACORN.

In fact, intimidation tactics, public charges of racism and threats to use CRA to block business expansion have enabled ACORN to extract hundreds of millions of dollars in loans and contributions from America's financial institutions.

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 9

No News is Bad news!

This is not a news web site!  It may look like one but it's not.  It does contain news, but news with a purpose.  The purpose is to give evidence for the viability of American Conservative political thought.  The stories here serve as source materials which support Conservative ideas.  These articles document the truth of Conservative fact claims.  Claims which conservatives are often times asked to support with sources.  We will attempt to put as many of those sources at your fingertips as possible. 
RocketTheme Joomla Templates